image by Dennis Evans, used in "Grasslands" documentary |
Ranchers who lease Crown land
in the roughly 1200 km2 of crown land in Saskatchewan and Alberta
where the EPO provisions apply have said they feel betrayed both by Environment
Canada and by the conservation communities who sued the Federal Government
forcing it to do something for a species they had been dithering over for
decades.
There is no point trying to dismiss that feeling of
betrayal. It needs to be heard and understood.
If you and your family have been holding onto native grass
and grazing it sustainably for generations, working with biologists and
government agencies when they show up with their clipboards and habitat programs;
and if you have meanwhile seen others in your region plough their grass under
when cattle prices dip and grain prices rise, you might get more than a little
upset one day when the government announces a new set of restrictions aimed at
the way you manage your pastures.
Fewer and fewer ranchers tending a smaller amount of native prairie are now left holding the species-at-risk bag. As the last defenders of native grass, they are naturally going to be upset when they see the government enact laws that focus on what can and cannot be done on the land they graze. After all, it was government policy that brought the plow to the prairie in the first place, and it was government policy that introduced generations of agriculture support programs that continued to cause the cultivation of native grass right through into the 1990s.
That is how the people who live and ranch in Sage Grouse
country see things and their perspective must be recognized and respected.
Hereford and Cowbirds |
The biologists and species at risk folks at Environment
Canada (EC), meanwhile, need to be heard as well. I think it is fair to say
that, like the ranchers, the staff at Environment Canada sincerely want to see things
work out well for the Greater Sage-Grouse and for the ranching families who
graze its remaining habitat.
The biologists and communications people at EC have spent
much of the last year trying to recover from the negative reaction the EPO stirred
up in southwestern Saskatchewan and southeastern
Alberta.
After some initial clumsiness in announcing the EPO, EC has done
a much better job of communicating to landowners in recent months.
They have made it clear that, in fact, the
EPO does not regulate grazing. It does not restrict, limit or affect grazing
levels and stocking rates. The Ministry has produced and distributed some
excellent documents that clear up most of the misunderstanding about what the
EPO does and does not mean. Take a look at this one that Environment Canada
posted online.
And, while Environment Canada
has said that the EPO does not apply to privately-owned land, where it
does apply, on Crown lands, they promise that funds are available to producers
to make their fences sage grouse-friendly and to take other stewardship
measures.
That sounds pretty good. But the ranchers have seen the same
documents I have read from Environment Canada, heard the same reassurances that
funds are available. Why are they not reassured? I will try to address that
question in the next post, but it begs another question—who should hold the bag
for species at risk? The tiny minority of ranchers who have been grazing the
habitat, or the wider Canadian public that benefits from the stewardship of our
last remnants of native prairie?
Black Angus on native range, image courtesy of Hamilton Greenwood |
Excellent article Trevor. Thank you for bringing balance to this insane Sage Grouse hysteria. It reminds me of when BSE hit the news, led with fear mongering tactics that created chaos and hardship for ranchers. The table has finally turned and people understand that it was not an epidemic. When will people finally understand that the Greater Sage Grouse in Canada are on the fringe of the greater population in the US and they are not becoming extinct. Thank goodness for the ranchers who have kept their native grasses to help keep the bird in Canada. Thank you for bringing balance Trevor!
ReplyDeleteHi Theresa--glad you liked it. If you have any thoughts on why the kind of funding EC is offering producers is not reassuring, do let me know. Email me anytime at trevorherriot@gmail.com.
ReplyDelete